Student Investigations

College rhetoric students investigate how messages work.

Students analyze real communication artifacts, explain rhetorical strategies, evaluate truth claims, and imagine more ethical alternatives.

Publication principle: The graded assignment and public publication decision should remain separate. Students may choose a full name, first name, pseudonym, anonymity, or no publication.
Student Analysis

Political language and belonging

A sample investigation of how slogans invite audiences into a shared identity.

Read sample →
Student Analysis

Advertising and manufactured urgency

A sample investigation of scarcity, color, emotion, and consumer choice.

Read sample →
Student Analysis

Memes and hidden arguments

A sample investigation of humor, identity, and compressed persuasion.

Read sample →

Recommended assignment structure

  1. Artifact: Identify the message, image, speech, video, or post.
  2. Context: Explain who created it, for whom, and under what circumstances.
  3. Rhetorical strategy: Analyze appeals, framing, language, style, and audience.
  4. Symbols and reality: Explain how the artifact constructs meaning.
  5. Truth analysis: Identify what is supported, distorted, hidden, or assumed.
  6. Ethical evaluation: Judge whether the communication is responsible.
  7. Alternative message: Show how it could communicate more truthfully or constructively.
  8. Reader challenge: End with one question inviting others to analyze.